French Find articles by Simon D. Received Oct 20; Accepted Jun
Received Oct 20; Accepted Jun This article has been cited by other articles in PMC. Associated Data The datasets supporting the conclusions of this review are available in the Additional files 2.
Data Abstraction Table, and Additional files 3. Thematic analysis of data. Understanding factors supporting the uptake of evidence can inform the design of strategies to narrow these EBP gaps.
Although research utilization RU and the factors associated with EBP have been reported in several health disciplines, to date this area has not been reviewed comprehensively in the chiropractic profession.
Searches were conducted using a combination of keywords and MeSH terms from the earliest date available in each database to May Quantitative and thematic analyses of the selected literature were conducted.
Thematic analysis for the three categories EBP, RU, KT revealed two themes related to EBP attitudes and beliefs of chiropractors; implementation of EBPthree related to RU guideline adherence; frequency and sources of information accessed; and perceived value of websites and search enginesand three related to KT knowledge practice gaps; barriers and facilitators to knowledge use; and selection, tailoring, and implementation of interventions.
EBP gaps were noted in the areas of assessment of activity limitation, determination of psychosocial factors influencing pain, general health indicators, establishing a prognosis, and exercise prescription. While most practitioners believed EBP and research to be important and a few studies suggested that traditional and online educational strategies could improve patient care, use of EBP and guideline adherence varied widely.
Conclusion Findings suggest that the majority of chiropractors hold favourable attitudes and beliefs toward EBP. However, much remains to be done for chiropractors to routinely apply evidence into clinical practice. Educational strategies aimed at practicing chiropractors can lead to more EBP and improved patient care.
The chiropractic profession requires more robust dissemination and implementation research to improve guideline adherence and patient health outcomes.
Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article doi: Chiropractic, Scoping review, Evidence-based practice, Research utilization, Knowledge translation Background Evidence-based practice EBPresearch utilization RUand knowledge translation KT are interrelated concepts that pertain to the identification, utilization and application of knowledge from research sources to clinical practice.
KT, on the other hand, emphasizes the synthesis, dissemination, exchange and application of knowledge from research findings, and from other sources, to influence changes in practice and improve health outcomes [ 3 ].
Thus, KT aims to help bridge the gap between research findings and what is routinely done in practice. Although there have been an increasing number of KT activities in recent years, much remains to be done to effectively translate research findings targeting healthcare professionals, consumers, and other stakeholders into clinical practice.
A number of articles have been published on EBP and determinants associated with the use of evidence in different healthcare professions, including medicine [ 4 — 7 ], nursing [ 89 ], dentistry [ 10 ], physical therapy [ 11 — 14 ], and occupational therapy [ 1315 ]. However, to date this area has not been reviewed comprehensively in the chiropractic profession [ 16 ].
Several barriers to implementing evidence in chiropractic practice have been previously proposed.
This has resulted in a wide range of attitudes and beliefs about EBP among chiropractors [ 18 ].Evidence-based practice (EBP) Research process Obstacle Research utilization PICOT At the conclusion of this chapter, the learner will be able to 1.
Identify the need for research to validate evidence-based practice 2. Define evidence-based practice 3. Discuss obstacles to evidence-based research 4.
Examine the nurse’s role in evidence . Evidence-based practice (EBP) Research process Obstacle Research utilization PICOT At the conclusion of this chapter, the learner will be able to Chapter 1 Connection Between Research and Evidence-Based Practice which the decision-making process for nursing care is based.
The difference between research utilizations and EBP is. Research utilization involves changing practice based on findings of a single research study; EBP is the syntheses of findings from multiple studies to incorporate with practitioner skills and client preference to determine best care.
Research, evidence-based practice (EBP), and quality improvement support the three main goals of the Magnet Recognition Program ® and the Magnet Model component of new knowledge, innovation, and improvements.
The three main goals of the Magnet Recognition Program are to: 1) Promote quality in a setting that supports professional . Research Module 1.
From Book: Essentials of Nursing Research: Appraising Evidence for Nursing Practice, edition 8. Models for Evidence-Based Nursing Practice • Many EBP models exist. As a nurse, you must understand the difference between research utilization and evidence-based nursing practice.
Which of the following best defines. Jul 13, · Evidence-based practice (EBP), research utilization (RU), and knowledge translation (KT) are interrelated concepts that pertain to the identification, utilization and application of knowledge from research sources to clinical practice.